Aren't we already tired of prompting?

"Hey AI, please find me an AI that doesn't need me to ask for everything."

This will soon become necessary.

The first global revelation of AI for consumers (ChatGPT) was chat-based. And rightfully so. It had the scope to guide from all of human knowledge. A chat interface - with the largest room for flexibility - was quite perfect for this.

Every AI tool however, has continued to double down on this.
From generating to editing, designing to coding, searching to filtering, and understanding to insight-seeking - most still work on prompts, with minor divergences and auto-completes, if any.

If multiple verticals have emerged in AI, with specific products, specific use-cases, and therefore narrower scopes, why need a flexibility that wide?!

At steady state, a user can't be prompting (or even speaking) all day, every day for all those tasks that benefit from the inclusion of AI.
And this sphere of potential tasks will only continue to expand rapidly ahead.

A tool should try to provide the shortest path to an outcome.
Nikita Bier had once famously said that "every user tap should be treated like a miracle". Typing a prompt for a repetitive, popular task is like expecting multiple miracles from each user, each time!

There have been a few instances of some good tools moving beyond it, but it's not nearly enough. Inherent, prompt-less intelligence is truly needed. That's running the show from within. Shortly and widely.

Faraday is happy to be taking this ahead.